Menü
Aktuelles

[Diskussion] Got questions about prompts and anything else you want to know, ask or share? Get in here!

Stapfschuh

Stapfschuh

Gottheit
right now, i'm downloading this checkpoint https://civitai.com/models/516638/feelingdiffusion?modelVersionId=574652
since i'm using a1111 and not comfyui, i couldn't test it. that checkpoint seems to run in a1111.
Post automatically merged:

okay... that downloaded one also doesn't work. well, as i was waiting i read through some comments on youtube and my final thought on sd3 is that i don't need to download and test it due to its super heavy censoring. not the censoring in general is bugging me, he fact that you won't get any good image is it.
 
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
Penniless7992

Penniless7992

Ungläubiger
"(((inverted-colors-style)))" comes out with some very interesting images. Thanks for finding another good prompt. I've been using "-art-style" for many months and now plan to experiment with mixing them together.
 
Penniless7992

Penniless7992

Ungläubiger
Your horrible results in Pony based models is because you are skipping the "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up" at the beginning of the prompt. It was an error in the original training that no one has been able to train back out yet. Also, you probably won't need so much prompt weight with parenthesis. Putting things like "source_pony, source_furry, source_anime, source_cartoon," in the negative helps with realism. Some models like "source_realism"/"source_real"/"source_realistic" but some turn it into an oil painting if those are in the positive. I'm not trying to be negative, but Pony models really are a different type of checkpoint. That is why loras and textual inversions made for other types of checkpoint go horribly wrong. It's like trying to prompt an English model with Chinese.


Code: 
Prompt:
score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up,1girl, outside, relaxing,
Negative prompt: source_furry, source_pony, source_cartoon, painting, censored, 3d, cgi, blurry, watermark, simple background, bad hands, deformed,
Steps: 20, Sampler: DPM++ 2M SDE, Schedule type: Exponential, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1808053711, Size: 896x1152, Model hash: 150fe1c0eb, Model: duchaitenPonyReal_ponyRealV10, VAE hash: 235745af8d, VAE: fixFP16ErrorsSDXLLowerMemoryUse_v10.safetensors, Clip skip: 2, Downcast alphas_cumprod: True, Version: v1.9.4


Image Width: 896 px
Image Height: 1152 px
 

Anhänge

  • Like
Reaktionen: mir
Stapfschuh

Stapfschuh

Gottheit
i never can find any difference in quality between sd and xl. but pony just is hardcore when it comes to freedom and creativity.
 
fullmanual

fullmanual

Ungläubiger
Hello there. Longtime-follower-from-civitai-recently-found-this-forum. My question is about how to have a man and woman in the same shot, only the woman is wearing glasses. It seems like whatever is in positive prompt applies to everyone regardless - eyewear, hairstyles, race, etc. Would love to avoid regional prompting if possible. Thank you for still posting!
 
Stapfschuh

Stapfschuh

Gottheit
fullmanual schrieb:
Hello there. Longtime-follower-from-civitai-recently-found-this-forum. My question is about how to have a man and woman in the same shot, only the woman is wearing glasses. It seems like whatever is in positive prompt applies to everyone regardless - eyewear, hairstyles, race, etc. Would love to avoid regional prompting if possible. Thank you for still posting!
Zum Vergrößern anklicken....
right. this place called me a copycat. no way i would trust anyone from this place ever agian...
 
K

KevinVideo

Ungläubiger
Stapfschuh,
I am a fan for longer than I can accurately tell you, but I only began messing around with AI generation in January of 2024. I think I found an old article of yours on civitai somewhere around a year ago, but it was attributed to [deleted], so I had no idea who you were. I found more articles attributed to the same author, and I started looking around more for the same kind of writing and prompting style. I finally found your name, which made searching for you easier because I always seemed to find you on sites just after you quit using them. I finally found you on here some months ago and registered an account, but some kind of glitch or whatever happened, and I didn't get the initial approval until the middle of last week and access to respond and post until a few days ago.

First of all, I want to say thank you for all of the hard work and effort that you have put in to figuring out how to simplify what literally all of us were overcomplicating and helping, at least, me to look at prompting in another way. You have changed the way I have made general prompts for an image series, and how I have put together prompts that I have used as wildcards. The results have been absolutely dramatic! Credit is due where credit is due, and my prompting would be years behind where it is if it weren't for your years of research and sharing your findings. It is definitely a shame that people are so self-centered that they are taking credit for your discoveries. Those who know, know. We will call them out when we see them.

I have read about numerous times when you decided to just "go with it" when you made an initial error and it turned into something pretty interesting. I had once downloaded an SD 1.5 checkpoint with "pony" in the name and really liked what it was able to do in SD 1.5 (the only platform I use). I went to the author's page and downloaded another checkpoint that he/she made without really looking into its "particulars". It turned out that it was a pony checkpoint, and it turned out that it made some amazing images, though loading the checkpoint took what seemed excessively long. I should mention that my style tends to be on the more erotic side, using only realistic checkpoints and prompts. Character embeddings and LoRAs were absolutely useless, but action-themed plugins worked wonderfully well. I started using more of your text prompts and less of the other files, and the image quality got even better. I am currently using a racial wildcard that I made (different from the usual generic races of most wildcards) that descriptively covers the regional races of the world, in a variety of sexual positions that stem from your "memorable" prompt article. To say that 1 in 100 images turned out bad would actually be an overstatement. It is rare that an image turns out looking bad. I have tried several but so far, I think the best has been "ultraRealisticBy_v10FP16", at least in my own tests so far. I have created numerous amazing images using this combination (I use Automatic1111 locally for generations) with your prompts and prompting technique as inspiration and wonder just how much further you could take this curiosity with the way that you look at checkpoints. Especially in an SD 1.5 environment.
 
Du musst dich einloggen oder registrieren, um hier zu antworten.
Oben